Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Middle East War IS the U.S. Strong Dollar Policy

Many Americans believe the war on terror in Iraq is really about the U.S. grabbing Middle East oil. This is not true ... at least not yet.

Instead, it is about creating instability in that oil-rich part of the globe for the sake of pushing up world oil prices. Sanctions against Iran only further this desired effect. The reaction in world oil markets prove this case because it is otherwise a well known fact global crude oil supplies are, indeed, plentiful enough to meet current demand.

The pursuit of political instability in the oil-rich regions of the world is in support of the U.S. strong dollar policy. That's because most oil procured on the global market MUST be purchased in U.S. dollars. This circumstance, therefore, is dollar supportive.

Yet, the dollar continues its gradual, yet relentless, five year slide. Why?

The credit creating machine on Wall Street called "Structured Finance" has so flooded the globe with dollar denominated securities that, not even a quadrupling of oil prices over the past five years could stem the debasement of our nation's currency that this massive expansion of privately created credit has caused.

It seems no one has asked this most relevant question:

Where is the money bidding up crude oil prices coming from?

Look no further than Wall Street's "Structured Finance."

So, now you know why Wall Street hates any politician opposed to our waging war in the Middle East ... because if we withdrew, the U.S. dollar might collapse overnight ... along with oil prices ... and Wall Street's vice grip over credit creation would instantly evaporate.

Should this occur the value of dollar-denominated securities held both in domestic and foreign accounts would, likewise, rapidly collapse ... and a replay of Wiemar Germany in November, 1923 would then be at hand.

Now, you can believe powerful people are intelligent, too. This includes those die-hard fascists who have seized control of a government "of, by and for the people." They are well aware of history's lessons. They understand the error of their ways in the 1930s when, with the evil of global war problematically delayed, a truly patriotic American like FDR could seize the day and further the cause of human freedom from tyranny.

That's why, today, modern-day fascists are so vehemently provoking the Islamic world. With their stranglehold over our Republic now threatened because their greed knows no bounds, thus, they have come to a point where they will either stand condemned, or use every lever at their disposal to finish our Constitutional Republic once and for all.

Friend! FDR foresaw this dangerous day, when, in his 1944 State of the Union Address he said...

“One of the great American industrialists of our day—a man who has rendered yeoman service to his country in this crisis-recently emphasized the grave dangers of "rightist reaction" in this Nation. All clear-thinking businessmen share his concern. Indeed, if such reaction should develop—if history were to repeat itself and we were to return to the so-called "normalcy" of the 1920's—then it is certain that even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of Fascism here at home.”

Indeed, the second shoe following 9/11 may be about to fall...

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Wall Street Frets Over Losing Rubber ... Stamp

The lead editorial in the June 11, 2007 edition of the Wall Street Journal more or less confirms the little ditty of common sense I wrote a while back... If You're a Whore, Then You NEED War.

The Journal — well beyond fashionably late — voiced a growing fear that the Bush White House is coming unglued. Citing the recent decision to replace both the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ostensibly in response to Senate Democrats' threats of a contentious reconfirmation hearing over the Iraq debacle, the Journal's editors accused the President of losing his nerve and betraying his friends:

"General Pace's fate is one more example of Mr. Bush's recent habit of abandoning those most closely identified with his Iraq policy. Paul Wolfowitz received only tepid support from Treasury while he was besieged at the World Bank, while I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby may soon go to jail because the President has refused to pardon him."

(Pardon Scooter? I thought this was a serious newspaper! Since when did they add a comics section?)

"There's a rumor going around," the Journal editors wrote, "that Robert Gates is the Secretary of Defense. We'd like to request official confirmation, because based on recent evidence the man running the Pentagon is Democratic Senator Carl Levin of Michigan. For that matter, is George W. Bush still President?"

Friends, let me be frank. Such is the language used when death threats are made.

But beyond this we ought remind the Journal, elections are not just some fashionably democratic, social event, to be reported and then forgotten. Indeed, the American political process might be characterized, historically, as answering the question, "How do we bring fresh water into the stale, stagnant pond that's choking with scum?"

Yet the Journal's editors maintain their grip on a slippery rock...

Monday, June 4, 2007

Congressman Reed Icculus on Global Warming

Over this past weekend I listened to Congressman Edward Markey's (D-MA) response to President Bush's weekly radio address. Mr. Markey's subject was global warming.

If I told you Congressman Markey goose-stepped in line with the mainstream, would you get some sense of my opinion on this issue? Let me share with you, then, a letter I wrote him...

Congressman:

Have you seen the documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle?"

Search Google. You will find it there.

Sir, don't you realize the days of the Democratic Party's alliance with fascists such as Al Gore are numbered? After all, the likes of Mr. Gore seem only to be doing the bidding of Wall Street in support of its nation-wrecking policy of globalization. Heck, he is running a hedge fund in London!

Some Democrat.

Frankly, that this man (much like yourself) would claim virtually 100% scientific consensus to mankind being the cause of global warming is uber arrogance in its own right. Why, even the head of NASA seems to agree with me!

I suggest you watch "The Great Global Warming Swindle." You see, the great thing about today's state-of-the-art communications technology is that thoughtful, dissenting voices can now be easily heard.

But political suppression of any thoughtful dialog about the cause of global warming is but a small part of my gripe...

When Mr. Gore says nuclear power should have "only a small part" in the solution to global warming (those are Fat Albert's words!)... when, contrarily, physical SCIENCE shows nuclear power produces zero CO2, and economic SCIENCE proves it to be two orders of magnitude cheaper than any fossil fuel in producing electricity, this simply reveals Mr. Gore for what he is: a FASCIST.

I do not use this word lightly. Consider the element of fascism which promotes extreme economic segmentation...

Will not the denial of technology to the under-developed world -- all because of some fantasy about mankind's role in global warming -- only perpetuate the disparity between the "haves" and the "have nots?"

Does not the stalling of state-of-the-art technologies -- like 4th generation, modular, high temperature, gas cooled nuclear reactors -- threaten to bury America's middle class even further into the Wall Street created, globalization hell-hole, particularly were policies toward restricting carbon output aggressively pursued, as the Congress seems hell-bent on doing?

Yeah, I hear your lip service to new technologies, but the things you speak of are a joke. Bio-fuels? While half a billion children in the world go to bed hungry each night? What kind of Democrat are you?

Clean coal? Solar? Sir, check your calendar... it's the 21st century!

That even a Democrat would propose these so-called "solutions" should come as no surprise, I guess. Any thinking American can see how this Congress seems to have perfected the art of pissing the taxpayer's money away.

I believe the days of the Wall Street subservient Democratic Party are numbered... so maybe you all should just carry on in fantasy during these final moments pretending you are providing FDR's party meaningful leadership because, given the VERY HIGHLY LEVERAGED, precarious state of the U.S. economy, chances are REAL GOOD that whatever this Democratic-controlled Congress "accomplishes" will, in all probability, be swept away. Such is life in pursuit of FANTASY.

And by the way, STOP using JFK's name. If you are a Kennedy Democrat, then I am Marilyn Monroe.

At least he challenged the nation to a goal of progressive accomplishment (as opposed to sucking up to the demands of the financial elite, which the alternative fuels agenda does), and did so not because its achievement would be easy, but because it would be hard. He knew the risks and dangers of sending men into space, but went there anyway, because he recognized his RESPONSIBILITY toward defending the general welfare of the nation and its posterity through the pursuit of ADVANCED technologies, as opposed to 17th century technologies. (You want windmills? Move to Holland!)

Again, I dare say PROGRESS is something the majority of so-called Democrats in Congress are only willing to give lip service to. How to carry the torch of TRUE SCIENCE (as opposed to Al Gore's Science Fiction) and lead the nation forward, is something Wall Street's Democrats seem to have little will to do (or is it, rather, courage that is lacking?).

Slay the beast -- Wall Street -- NOT ME. Tax financial derivatives, not gasoline.

Then, once that's done, you can actually do your job... which, by the way, involves something more than sucking up to whatever agenda this financial elite feeds the media (which they FIRMLY control, top down).

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA)... you, too, might be Reed Icculus.

Lastly...

To the fat boy spokesperson for BP (British Petroleum) holding up a sugar beet, "educating" us about bio-fuels, claiming the source for this can be grown year after year... take a walk to the ocean. You'll lose some weight (so ask Al Gore to come along!) and you will discover an energy source that's there for the taking 365 days a year: HYDROGEN.

Friday, April 6, 2007

"The Fuehrer" of Global Warming Goes To Washington: Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) v. Al Gore (a.k.a. "Al Goebbels")

Before I share a letter I wrote today to U.S. Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), ranking minority member on the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee, I have a story...

For whatever reason, I dreamed up this fine alias for Al Gore ("Al Goebbels") after seeing his performance before the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee on March 21, 2007.

Not being intimately familiar with the spelling of this Nazi's name, I went to Google. First entry returned in my search was from Wikipedia. Oddly, the abstract for Joseph Goebbels demonstrated how God works in mysterious ways (I couldn't have picked a better pseudonym!)...

"Goebbels was known for his zealous and energetic oratory, virulent anti-Semitism, and perfection of the so-called Big Lie technique of mass propaganda."

By no means do I claim Mr. Gore is anti-Semitic. However, I have read he has a history of racism.

Per the other two things, though, Mr. Gore and Mr. Goebbels appear one and the same.

That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.

Here's my letter to Senator Inhofe...

Dear Sir:

Pardon me for beginning this letter rudely, but as a democrat, you have my permission to tell Sen. Barbara Boxer to shut her arrogant pie hole anytime you wish! Having once again watched her belittle you during Senate Environment & Public Works Committee hearings (this time while former Senator Al Goebbels testified about man-made global warming) I am simply left shaking my head in disgust. I thought Senators were supposed to be utterly dignified. She, contrarily, insists upon coming off as a childish, tit-for-tat, jerk.

Now about anti-human Al's testimony... Did you notice how badly he fumbled when one of your republican colleagues suggested sun spot activity might have a direct correlation to the earth's climate? For a guy who humbled himself to professional disciplines "beyond his pay scale" on a number of occasions, I was a bit alarmed to see how decisively he claimed no scientific consensus to the possibility that the sun could be impacting earth's climate.

I recently saw a documentary that delved into this very subject. It was called, "The Great Global Warming Swindle." It aired on London's WAG TV... I'm not sure when, but I am gathering it was recently. Up until a couple days ago, you could have watched the entire broadcast on YouTube. It has since been pulled due to copyright infringement. Apparently, though, this documentary will soon be available on DVD. Check out the following website:

http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.com/

The demand for more information on this subject has been so great that, apparently, the above website was created as a consequence. When you go there you will learn that the site is a work in progress. I hope you, your staff and your colleagues will keep an eye on it. I suspect you will gain some of the ammunition you will need to bring truth to this debate about the causes of global warming.

That's probably wishful thinking on my part. This is, after all, the "Rubber Stamp" Congress. Democrat or Republican, it does not matter...

Tap, tap, tap, SLAM... What's that say?

"Made on Wall Street"

...the capitol of China. Choke on that CO2!

"The Fuehrer" of Global Warming Goes To Washington: Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) v. Al Gore (a.k.a. "Caligula")

Here's a letter I sent via e-mail to U.S. Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) responding to comments he made during Climate Change Hearings on March 21, 2007 before the U.S. Senate Environment & Public Works Committee. Senator Craig's remarks were directed toward the reincarnation of Roman Emperor Caligula, Al Gore, following his testimony revealing (to those with eyes that see) how a certain powerful faction of the Democratic Party is not the least bit interested in alleviating the marginalization of the middle class in the U.S...

(p.s. I saw you nodding your head in agreement Ms. Clinton! Are you a fascist too?)

Dear Sir:

Remarks you made about your state's deployment of nuclear power during Environment & Public Works Committee Climate Change Hearings with Al Gore testifying were well-received and appreciated here in upstate NY. You appear very well informed on this subject. I would contrast this to Mr. Gore... Seems everything (including basic trigonometric functions like sine and cosine) was "beyond his pay scale." How he is qualified to speak upon such a complex subject as global climate change escapes me, considering the number of times he admitted simpler subjects were "beyond his pay scale."

Sir, I am a democrat and I am mildly distressed over how my party is being hijacked by mean, spiteful, anti-human people like Al Gore and Barbara Boxer.

Mr. Gore reveals his true colors when he claims nuclear power ought have "a small part" in solving the global warming problem he trumpets. Someone claiming scientific consensus on the human cause of global warming (and we both know this is a bald-faced lie) ought likewise know that the energy efficiencies afforded by nuclear power are scientifically proven to be an order of magnitude greater than those afforded by fossil fuels. As such, nuclear power offers a solution to so many problems — both real and imaginary — that make pursuit of its aggressive build-out practically a political no-brainer.

Unfortunately, a no-brainer is a different beast than NO BALLS.

"And the home of the ..." what?

It ain't eunuchs, dear Congress!

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Wall Street Alert: Calling The Good American


Mother Lyndon... oh my, you've set your Chinese pantry all ablaze!

Now, might a third of our stock soon evaporate?

What will your servants consolidate among the crumbs you'll leave behind?

Where next on your bosom's wild, whipsaw ride? (Yee Haw!)

So many questions...

Only the good American imagines answers scarcely dreamed. These alone see blood's writing on your kitchen wall.

Still, Nature's Law lights a way out: No killing plague shall terrorize a soul determined to alleviate the awful vulnerability you've created.

Not now and not when this began ... because even surrounded by your greed's smoke, the united few freely alert the masses your poisonous gases, soon enough, will choke.

Good hope's courage, then, is risen to Luke 12:4 and the One Spirit that could ever utter such a thing.

For only the good perceive how immortality born of Great Calamity might very well be at hand.

So, then, good American, courage must ask:

Who else wants to see how Jesus multiplied the loaves?

Surely, you alone know this with perfect conviction: The cooks who served up 9-11 most certainly don't.

Monday, January 29, 2007

Hillary Clinton Says: Change Your Habits; Let's Drink & Drive Instead!

You would think U.S. politicians would know better than preach the gospel of sacrifice to those whose votes they seek.

Case in point: Hillary Clinton speaking about Energy Policy during a campaign appearance in Des Moines, Iowa on Saturday, January 27, 2007.

Of course, the further development of politically correct "alternative" energy sources was a stated priority. You know, the kind requiring more [expensive] energy input than is produced. All the "bio" whatever that's likely to create more bottlenecks (particularly at the dinner table) than if Iran sunk their entire Navy in the Strait of Hormuz.

Last mentioned was hydrogen. Now, this alternative probably should be our nation's first pursuit, and we should go after it like we did the Moon, back in the 1960s.

Not to be outdone by Jimmy Carter, Senator Clinton followed by also saying Americans will have to "change their [energy consumption] habits."

Let me reply with this: Now that "grass" has become an "attractive" alternative fuel, those who push sacrifice on the American public would do better to smoke it than propose turning it into fuel.

Because sacrifice is the LAST thing Americans are willing to do. And who can blame them?

So, my advice is stop being a political fool, Senator Clinton, and start getting creative.

John F. Kennedy challenged this nation with boldness, creativity and vision when he set us on a mission to land a man on the Moon. The only "sacrifice" necessary was time in pursuit of that hard mission's accomplishment. And the benefits we accrued as a consequence made such "sacrifice," really, a no-brainer.

We desperately need the same boldness, creativity and vision today when it comes to our nation's energy policy.

Let's start by looking at our cities. Take New York City, for example.

Buildings extend to the sky. But the city's roadways reach only to the first floor. Why not to the 20th or the 50th or more? Might I suggest massive pursuit of a clean hydrogen energy policy? That way we can drive indoors. So, what are now streets and avenues might then become undeveloped property (easy Mr. Trump).

Then, add greater command and control using technology. For God's sake, with GPS and modern computer networking capability, I should be able to get into my car, tell it where I want to go, pop open a beer and enjoy a hands-free ride.

Because conquering such a feat is not a question of insurmountable technological barriers. Rather, it's all about statesmanship and political will, and nothing more.

There's nothing to sacrifice, then, other than those who lack the vision and will to make America's roadways safe enough to do what is, today, ill-advised:

Drink and drive.

After all, it is the American way...

Sunday, January 28, 2007

If You're A Whore, Then You NEED War

I love the smell of financial rot in the morning. Because it reminds me of WHY we must wage war.

Please, I beg you, tell me.

What must the nation borrowing nearly $1 trillion per year from the world at large do to ensure the continued flow of finance into the game called "A Sound, Vibrant, Healthy Economy?"

It must flex its muscle and demonstrate its intention that the game continue without dissent.

Consider what happened December '06 when Thailand unilaterally implemented currency controls to stem the rise of its currency against the dollar.

Do you doubt the financial tyrant is dangerously leveraged?

Then you didn't see the freak show on CNBC the morning after.

The talk was about the possibility of "systemic crisis" swamping the whore masters: hedge funds and private equity.

And cooler minds know that, when a tiny nation like Thailand can create such big financial waves, the substance of global arrangements is largely a confidence game.

There's little left but guns, outwardly pointing, ensuring copious loads of butter to grease what is euphemistically called our "Sound, Vibrant, Healthy Economy."

Is it any wonder, then, that President Bush is being so reticent about Iraq?

Whose back pocket is he in? (He, and the rest of Nixon's nasty leftovers.)

Who invited him and the Republican Party back to the self-proclaimed "Financial Capital of the World" for the '04 convention?

Was this their doggie treat for dutifully sleeping while the city was violently attacked?

Two steps forward, one step back. As tax paying Americans, why wouldn't we ask:

How could a nation that, generation after generation, spends so many billions on defense and intelligence find itself so vulnerable to a bunch of cave dwelling, dog gassing, monkey bar climbing Oswalds?

Of course, such musing might, indeed, seem insane if there were not so many similarities to a different story that began on Novemer 22, 1963...

Friday, January 26, 2007

Hillary Clinton: Transgendered For President

Fortunately, intelligent speech is no more prerequisite for becoming a political commentator than it is for becoming President of the United States. So, U.S. Senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and I are equals, here in the land of the free to be "nasty" to whatever tyranny freaks us out.

Here, then, is how you might believe she really is qualified to be our next President...

Consider but her mighty balls, because they are well worth weighing. Particularly given their place in the land without a chin.

Rehashing old history, just for the fun of it and that little thing called "principle," she actually forgave her husband's infidelity. And I believe there's a lot to be said for that. That's integrity. And that's something in short supply these days, particularly with all of Wall Street's and London's Credit flooding the globe and making it oh so easy for better people to be, well, whores.

But, someday, friend, our nation's current account, she probably gonna blow up somehow. In fact, I think you can bank on this. And then what?

Two possibilities stand out, given the extraordinarily leveraged circumstances of our time: revolution or all-out war.

Because a financial tyranny is, right now, leveraged to the hilt and vulnerable.

If you doubt this, simply open your eyes, because this is no secret in either Washington or New York.

Case in point was revealed during the debate over Social Security privatization in '05.

There was my Senator Clinton laying out the facts before a Senate Subcommittee on Aging. Every American with ears could have easily heard her say it: The U.S. Treasury would be bankrupt long before the Social Security Trust Fund.

FRIEND: THE U.S. TREASURY.

She is absolutely correct, too. We are purposely being bankrupted. And every hack CNBC throws in our face claiming otherwise is a neck for the gallows.

It took a lot of balls for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to point that fact out to the chinless wonders formerly in the majority. In fact, the only similar Republican voice I recall was Ron Paul from the, uh, Libertarian Hell Party.

So, it seems Mrs. Clinton understands the power of leverage, given the high probability that some jaggov somewhere will decide, for greed or other sinister designs, to throw the financial freight train called "Structured Finance" in reverse.

FRIEND: IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. And it might happen much sooner than you think.

That's why a presidential candidate demonstrating some inkling of knowledge about the truth surrounding our dangerously precarious financial position might make a good first choice for at least your serious consideration.

Just listen to the mainstream media. The more bashing of Ms. Clinton you hear, the more you know their Wall Street masters quake with fear, as they well should.

Ding dong. Time to wake up and smell the financial rot.